Discussion:
Do school staff members have the right to pray?
(too old to reply)
Rudy Canoza
2022-06-30 03:04:23 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:02:29 -0500, Mitchell Holman
eyf_nZ2dnUU7-
Whereas I would say that if one wishes to discuss one's faith,
he
has that right. If you don't want to hear it, leave.
Students who leave are called truants.
Huh?
The case in question involves prayer by a coach after a sporting
event, not prayer in a class.
Why do you support public prayers that
even Jesus condemned?
Well, pastor?
Well what?
Why do you support Christians engaging in
the public prayers that even Jesus condemned?
Why can you not tell the difference between a political discussion
and
a
theological discussion?
What political discussion?
Jesus told all Christians to
NOT pray in public, you support
Christians who do just that.
Do you have a cite for that? Chapter and verse would be appreciated.
"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites,
for they love to pray standing in the synagogues
and on the street corners to be seen by others.
Truly I tell you, they have received their reward
in full. But when you pray, go into your room,
close the door and pray to your Father, who is
unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done
in secret, will reward you."
Matthew 6:5
To religious bigots and blasphemers and idolators like Hartung, who ignore the
actual teachings of Christ, that passage is exactly wrong. To Hartung, being
*seen* praying, rather than the content and sincerity of the prayer, are
all-important. This fucking religious bigot coach is exactly the same. The
content and sincerity of the prayer were not important in the least. The only
important thing was that he be *seen* by others praying at the 50 yard line.
That's all he cared about.

This is absolutely true about "bible study" as well. The point of "bible study"
is not to learn about the meaning of what Jesus said. The *sole* point of it is
to be *seen* by others to be engaged in it. The only "virtue" is in performing
the act of "bible study"; actually learning any meaning from it has zero value.

This is settled.
Morris Horace
2022-06-30 06:04:33 UTC
Permalink
news:i9jpbhl3t2btsgjg7s9ijkrrc3gfldt996
Post by Rudy Canoza
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:02:29 -0500, Mitchell Holman
eyf_nZ2dnUU7-
In article <rNadnfcT-siSWCT_nZ2dnUU7-
Whereas I would say that if one wishes to discuss one's faith,
he
has that right. If you don't want to hear it, leave.
Students who leave are called truants.
Huh?
The case in question involves prayer by a coach after a sporting
event, not prayer in a class.
Why do you support public prayers that
even Jesus condemned?
Well, pastor?
Well what?
Why do you support Christians engaging in
the public prayers that even Jesus condemned?
Why can you not tell the difference between a political
discussion
Post by Rudy Canoza
and
a
theological discussion?
What political discussion?
Jesus told all Christians to
NOT pray in public, you support
Christians who do just that.
Do you have a cite for that? Chapter and verse would be
appreciated.
Post by Rudy Canoza
"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites,
for they love to pray standing in the synagogues
and on the street corners to be seen by others.
Truly I tell you, they have received their reward
in full. But when you pray, go into your room,
close the door and pray to your Father, who is
unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done
in secret, will reward you."
Matthew 6:5
To religious bigots and blasphemers and idolators like Hartung, who ignore the
actual teachings of Christ, that passage is exactly wrong. To
Hartung, being
Post by Rudy Canoza
*seen* praying, rather than the content and sincerity of the
prayer, are
Post by Rudy Canoza
all-important. This fucking religious bigot coach is exactly the same. The
content and sincerity of the prayer were not important in the
least. The only
Post by Rudy Canoza
important thing was that he be *seen* by others praying at the 50 yard line.
That's all he cared about.
Then your issue is that the man exercises his rights of free speech
and religion?

Two constitutional rights that you admittedly would never serve your
country or fellow man to defend and protect?

Even John Kerry did that.
Post by Rudy Canoza
This is absolutely true about "bible study" as well. The point of "bible study"
is not to learn about the meaning of what Jesus said. The *sole* point of it is
to be *seen* by others to be engaged in it. The only "virtue" is in performing
the act of "bible study"; actually learning any meaning from it has zero value.
I see your point and raise you gay pride parades.

Would you willingly accept another man's penis in your rectum, then
take it uncleaned in your mouth after he empties his seed in your
bowels?

Is that the sole point of "gay pride"? Sick perverted males wearing
women's clothing or none at all, prancing around and leering at
children?

Are they targeting children to replenish the dead and dying, because
they are unable to naturally reproduce male-on-male?
Post by Rudy Canoza
This is settled.
Yes, I believe it is.

Loading...